Turniej Pokemon

ghdhair100

䡯眠瑯⁃桯潳攠䍲慦琠䵡瑥物慬猠景爠卣牡灢潯歳ഊ䡯眠瑯⁣桯潳攠慤桥獩癥猠ഊੁ摨敳楶敳⁡牥⁩浰潲瑡湴⁴漠步数⁹潵爠獣牡灢潯欠浡瑥物慬猠瑯来瑨敲⸠䉵祩湧⁴桥⁣潲牥捴⁡摨敳楶敳⁩猠橵獴⁡猠業灯牴慮琠瑯⁫敥瀠祯畲⁰桯瑯猠獡晥⸠卣牡瀠扯潫敲猠睡湴⁴漠慤桥牥⁴漠瑨攠鍃䬠佋鐠獥慬猠睨敮⁰畲捨慳楮朠慤桥獩癥献⁓潭攠灥潰汥⁵獥⁲畢扥爠捥浥湴⁴漠捲敡瑥⁳捲慰扯潫猬⁹整⁲散敮琠獴畤楥猠桡猠獨潷渠瑨慴⁴桥⁭慴敲楡氠睩汬⁤慭慧攠灨潴潳⸠奯甠捡渠捨潯獥⁧汵敳Ⱐ灡獴攬⁯爠瑡灥⁴漠捲敡瑥⁹潵爠獣牡灢潯欬⁷桩捨⁩猠祯畲⁣桯楣攮⁔桥⁢敳琠浡瑥物慬猠桯睥癥爠慲攠灲潶楤敤⁴漠祯甠楮⁴桩猠慲瑩捬攮‍਍ੈ潷⁴漠捨潯獥⁡摨敳楶敳㨠ഊ䅤桥獩癥猠楮捬畤攠倮䄮吮 偨潴漠䅣瑩癩瑹⁔敳琩⁭慴敲楡汳⸠倮䄮吮⁨慳⁴敳瑥搠瑨攠慤桥獩癥猠瑯⁭慫攠獵牥⁴桡琠楴⁷楬氠湯琠摡浡来⁹潵爠獣牡灢潯欮⁁摨敳楶敳⁩湣汵摥⁡捲祬楣⁢慳敤⁯爠獴慲捨敤⁢慳敤⁰牯摵捴猬⁷桩捨⁡牥⁳慦攠步数献⁒敶敲獩扬攠慤桥獩癥猬⁷桩瑥⁡湤⽯爠捯汯牬敳猬⁯摯爠晲敥Ⱐ捨敭楣慬⁡摤楴楶敳Ⱐ浩杲慴潲礬⁮潮⵴潸楣Ⱐ湥畴牡汩穥搠灈⁳敶敲⁯爠桩杨敲Ⱐ整挠慲攠獡晥⁫敥瀠慤桥獩癥猠瑯⁣牥慴攠獣牡灢潯歳⸠ഊഊ䅮礠杬略⁹潵⁰畲捨慳攠獨潵汤⁮潴⁲畮Ⱐ牥污砬⁯爠桡癥⁡湹⁯摯牳⁯湣攠楴⁤物敳⸠䥴⁳桯畬搠湯琠瑲慮獦敲⁥楴桥爮⁍潲敯癥爬⁴桥⁧汵攠獨潵汤⁮潴⁤楳瑯牴Ⱐ捯汯爬⁯爠摡浡来⁹潵爠灨潴潳⸠ഊ੔䥐㨠啳攠桥慶礠灡灥爠睨敮⁣牡晴楮朠祯畲⁳捲慰扯潫⸠ഊഊ䥮⁣牡晴⁳瑯牥猬⁹潵⁷楬氠晩湤⁡⁳敬散瑩潮⁯映杬略猬⁩湣汵摩湧⁳瑩捫猬⁢潴瑬攠汩煵楤猬⁧汵攠灥湳Ⱐ整挮⁙潵⁣慮⁴敳琠瑨攠灲潤畣瑳⁴漠獥攠睨楣栠慲攠扥獴⁳畩瑥搠景爠祯畲⁳捲慰扯潫⁰牯捥獳⸠周攠杬略⁳瑩捫猠慲攠楤敡氠楦⁹潵⁷慮琠瑯⁰牯摵捥⁡⁳捲慰扯潫⁷楴栠汥獳⁴桥⁭畤摬攮⁆潲⁳浡汬敲⁰牯橥捴猬⁹潵⁭慹⁷慮琠瑯⁵獥⁴桥⁰敮献⁙潵⁷楬氠湥敤⁴漠慰灬礠敮潵杨⁦潲捥⁴漠獴楣欠祯畲⁳浡汬敲⁯扪散瑳⸠啳攠瑨攠扯瑴汥搠汩煵楤⁧汵攠瑯⁳瑩捫⁤楥⁣畴猬⁦牡杭敮瑳Ⱐ潲⁳捲慰献‍਍੉映祯甠睡湴⁴漠敭扥汬楳栬⁹潵⁣慮⁵獥⁴桥⁴睯⵷慹⁰敮献⁗桥渠瑨攠灥湳⁡牥⁭潩獴⁩琠灲潶楤敳⁡牥⁳瑥牮⁡摨敳楶攬⁹整⁹潵⁣慮⁲敭潶攠祯畲⁳捲慰猬⁰慰敲猬⁰桯瑯猬⁥瑣Ⱐ慴⁹潵爠捯湶敮楥湣攮‍਍੓捯瑣栠瑡灥⁩猠杲敡琠瑯⁵獥⁡猠慤桥獩癥献⁔慰攠楳⁥慳楥爠瑯⁵獥⁴桡渠杬略献⁗桥渠捨潯獩湧⁴慰攠桯睥癥爠浡步猠獵牥Ⱐ祯甠桡癥⁡⁴慰攠牯汬敲⸠呡灥⁷楬氠灲潶楤攠祯甠愠牥癥牳慬⁡汯湧⁷楴栠煵楣欠灲潣敳獩湧⸠剥癥牳楢汥⁴慰攠楮捬畤敳⁴桥⁤潵扬攠瑡灥⁡汳漮⁔漠畳攠瑡灥猠浥牥汹⁣潮獩杮⁴桥⁳捯瑣栠瑡灥⁯爠摯畢汥⁴慰攠潮⁹潵爠灡来献⁏渠瑨攠潰灯獩瑥⁳楤攬⁳瑩捫⁹潵爠敭扥汬楳桭敮瑳Ⱐ摯捵浥湴猬⁰桯瑯猬⁥瑣⸠‍਍ੇ汵攠慮搠瑡灥⁩猠捨敡灥爠瑨慮⁴桥⁘祲潮⁭慣桩湥献⁔桥⁭慣桩湥猠睩汬⁭慫攠異ⁱ畡汩瑹⁳捲慰扯潫献⁔桥⁭慣桩湥猠慲攠楤敡氠楦⁹潵⁰污渠瑯⁣牥慴攠浵汴椭獣牡灢潯欠灲潪散瑳⸠奯甠捡渠畳攠瑨攠浡捨楮攠慳⁡⁬慭楮慴潲⸠䥮⁡摤楴楯測⁹潵⁣慮⁭慫攠獴楣步牳⁷楴栠瑨攠塹牯渠浡捨楮敳‍ਊ䥮⁡摤楴楯渠瑯⁴桥⁭慣桩湥猬⁧汵敳Ⱐ瑡灥猬⁥瑣Ⱐ祯甠浡礠睡湴⁴漠楮癥獴⁩渠灨潴漠獰汩瑳⁡湤⁰牥捵琠杬略Ⱐ灡獴攬⁣敭敮琬⁥瑣⸠ਊ䡯眠瑯⁵獥⁳灬楴瑥牳㨠ഊ呯⁵獥⁰桯瑯⁳灬楴猠祯甠捡渠摲慧⁯畴⁹潵爠瑡扳⸠佮捥⁹潵⁴畧⁯畴⁹潵爠瑡戨猩⁳畢浩琠瑨敭⁴漠祯畲⁳捲慰扯潫⁰慧攮⁙潵⁷楬氠湥敤⁴漠獫楮Ⱐ潲⁵湰敥氠瑨攠污祥牳⁡琠瑨攠瑯瀮‍ਊ佮捥⁹潵⁤散楤攠睨楣栠慤桥獩癥猠祯甠睡湴⁴漠畳攠祯甠睩汬⁮敥搠瑯⁣潮獩摥爠楮欮⁉渠瑨攠浥慮瑩浥Ⱐ瑨攠杬略猠獨潵汤⁮潴⁨慶攠慣楤猠楮捯牰潲慴敤⁩湴漠楴猠獵扳瑡湣攮⁉渠慤摩瑩潮Ⱐ瑨攠慤桥獩癥猠獨潵汤⁢攠汩杮楮ⵦ牥攮‍਍੓捲慰扯潫猠慲攠愠睡礠瑯⁢物湧⁹潵爠晡浩汹⁴潧整桥爮⁄潷渠瑨牯畧栠瑨攠祥慲猠祯甠捡渠牥癩敷⁹潵爠獣牡灢潯歳⁴漠牥捡汬⁬潳琠浥浯物敳Ⱐ潲⁴漠獰慲欠晲慧浥湴敤⁭敭潲楥猬⁢物湧楮朠瑨敭⁴漠愠晵汬⁰楣瑵牥⸠呯⁣牡晴⁹潵爠獣牡灢潯欠桯睥癥爬⁹潵⁷慮琠瑯ₓ䭥数⁓慦斔⁩渠浩湤⸠䭥数⁓慦攠浥慮猠瑯⁰畲捨慳攠浡瑥物慬猠瑨慴⁰牯瑥捴⁹潵爠捥牴楦楣慴敳Ⱐ灨潴潳Ⱐ汥瑴敲猬⁮敷猠捬楰灩湧猬⁡湤⁲敬慴敤⁥浢敬汩獨浥湴献‍਍ੁ猠䤠獡楤Ⱐ潮捥⁹潵⁰畲捨慳攠祯畲⁧汵敳⁹潵⁷慮琠瑯⁣潮獩摥爠楮欮⁉湫⁩猠祯畲⁷物瑩湧⁴潯氠瑨慴⁨敬灳⁹潵⁴漠慤搠橯畲湡汳Ⱐ獴潲祢潯歳Ⱐ牥捯牤猬⁮慭敳Ⱐ摡瑥猬⁥瑣⸠ഊഊ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]