Turniej Pokemon

t2568156n

It is understood that the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2007, the defendant Fen Cheng deposit to loan sharking, invest in real estate and other business needs cash flow and other grounds, 20-70 per million per day, the high interest as bait, through the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance loan, and was the way,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], one after another such as fraud victims Huang Moumou 15 100 000 000 yuan,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], for the overspending, gambling, and was Moumou Council for Mutual Economic Assistance and others, resulting in the loss of huge amounts of money, inability to repay . Among them, only to be fraudulent 45,575,000 yuan Huang Moumou. Huang deception, but also because of his own crime of illegal detention deposits from the public.
2008 年 4 23, yellow at the court hearing, tell the brother Huang, Cheng-fen may flee to save or Shanghai, Zhengzhou, asked Hwang to help find and put the money back. Hwang has been kept driving on the outside looking Fen Cheng. At 0:20 on May 25, 2008 Xu, Hwang Helen Road in Hongkou District, Shanghai, chess and card room to find a deposit Fen Cheng, and it seized and turned over to the public security bureau.
court held that the fraud indictment identified Fen Cheng deposit amount is based on deposit Fen Cheng and Huang Moumou other 15 were the victims in accordance with the victims and confirmed by Cheng Fen deposits, according to reconcile the arrears owed by the two sides confirmed amount of funding should be identified as the amount of fraud, the court Fen Cheng save only 2,000 million on the amount of defense and counsel on the alleged lack of evidence the defense part of the amount of advice can not be established. The counsel on public deposits constitute the crime of illegally defense does not match the opinions and facts and the law shall not be accepted. Cheng criminal defendant kept a huge amount of fun, and the interests of the state and people caused especially heavy losses, extremely serious crimes, according to the law should be severely punished. The decision was made. (End)
During the trial, argued in court the amount of Fen Cheng save only 2,000 yuan, the public security organs before his false confession. The defendants argue that Zheng's conduct did not meet the fund-raising constituent elements of criminal fraud, and illegal deposits from the public meet the circumstances of a crime the crime, the illegal deposits from the public shall be convicted and punished for its sins.

相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]