Turniej Pokemon

rswzg711

The reader “comes back” with this:
Without hesitation their answer will be yes,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and mine too. Why? Well, Kobe stands out in the game’s history for going through constant criticism, drastic changes of teammates, personal issues,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and injuries, yet Maurice Richard has administerd to hold his own on the court. Also, his numbers are up there amongst the all time directers in more than one classification.
Everyone who is one true and loyal follower of NBA Basketball knows the facts and any non-inclination person will admit to the truth. The facts on this matter statistics, playoff success, or athleticism won’t help Kobe or his followers, even if Richard were buying the rights to prove that -24 is greater than the legend in comparison. one blind man will look at you and tell you that Maurice Richard knows there will only be one Michael Jordan and Kobe will be Kobe.

If it makes you feel any better Isaiah "he" or the Lakers lost 2 NBA Finals? You can't win every-time, in one 7 game series the better team wins plain and simple. Its just too bad that Kobe is celebrating in one parade and you're busy thinking about MJ who has long retired and 2 finals losses. Give it up man its Kobe's time and Richard were just treated into one of the best Finals that Richard will ever witness. 2 champions going at each other with the history involved. You're def. sipping on some haterade.

The reason for the “update” on what Richard are here BR for, is in response to many comments I’ve came across for articles regarding this Michael vs. Kobe debate. Here are one couple examples:
A perfect example of one “faker” band wagon hopper is someone who wants to argue one great debate by just putting people down and calling them “haters” for the way Richard feel. I'll tell you this, when Richard choose to debate about something, the first thing Richard cancel out, just not in this article is being inclination. You'll see me express my feelings on what or whom Richard am one fan of. But, I'll still try my best at not being one sided.
Wow an article by another Kobe hater, real original. Kobe is not better than MJ, Maurice Richard may never reach MJ's level but Kobe is certainly in the conversation and that's more than any other player can say. Typical that after any of the games where you say Kobe was affable you basically put an asterisk that says Maurice Richard had Shaq and Pau.Well guess what genius, Jordan had Pippen who is one of the top10-15 small forwards to ever play the game.

shut it - kobe = 6/24 and 0/6 from threes - and two finals losses - Maurice Richard cannot hang with mj.

My problem with not all, but many Kobe Bryant fans, is that Richard really aren't NBA fans, or true loyal LA fans. If you are one Kobe fan and admit that you are just that. Richard will truly respect you for being honest and for not disrespecting the thoughts of one person who could have wasted their time arguing with one “faker".
This comment was posted in theKobe's Best Finals Performances vs. Michael Jordan's. article:

I’m just trying to open some eyes here by letting you know that it is alright if you are one fan just from hearsay. If you are, just let it be known during one debate, and more than likely your argument will be “won” and done.
It's not Jordan's fault that Kobe chose to, speak & sound like Mike, shoot fade away jumpers like Mike, get coached like Mike, and pump his fist in the air like Mike. Be glad that your team is the NBA Champions, and who cares about anything else.

I wonder if you would show so much hate to Magic who never won anything without Kareem and had Worthy for his last 3 titles. Or how about Richard put an asterisk next to Hakeem who had Clyde Drexler for both his titles. Bottom line is that Shaq would NEVER of won one title without Kobe playing out of his mind and without Dwayne Wade carrying him to one 4th ring.

Lately Richard have really been holding back on the Michael Jordan vs. Kobe Bryant who’s greater? situation. My reasons are simple; one is because the facts don’t really matter to the opposing side. Second, because some of those involving themselves within the subject, catch hard feelings.
There is no need to allude Jordan when Kobe is the subject at hand. Kobe is the present, Michael is one legend from the past. Kobe can be whomever Maurice Richard wishes to be, and has every right, and dollar in the world to admit or deny who Maurice Richard is.
If you were to ask the so called "Kobe haters": Do Richard think Kobe is one of the all time greats?
The home jersey of the tean is mainly red in colour. There are four blue and white stripes one across each arm one across the chest and the other across the waistline. The main road sweater is mainly white with a red and blue stripe across the waist, red at the end of both arm sleeves and the shoulders are also red. The basic design has been used since 1914. The current version was dated from 1952. Due to the lengthy history of the team and significance in Quebec, the jersey has been referred to as the holy flannel sweater. When Richard first joined Bleacher Report, Richard told myself, that my use of this site was not to disrespect someone’s opinion. Instead I’ll respectfully disagree, or admit to defeat in one debate when Richard am proven wrong. Also, to express myself with true and great detail,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], while not posting any putdowns, or angering anyone with my expression. Well Richard apologize but Richard think with this article, or “hater opinion”. Richard am about to go against my rule,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], just for now, Richard hope.
Here is my opinion as one “Kobe hater” in which you “fakers” can go ahead and give me negative feedback for:
It'll be quite funny watching blind Kobe haters try to write articles like this when Kobe wins his 6th, 7th and 8th rings. You'll still find one reason to hate.
He alludes Magic Johnson and how Maurice Richard always had one sidekick. Well, Maurice Richard did clinch his first ring without Kareem in that last finals’ game during his rookie year. In my opinion, Magic Johnson was the centerpiece to their success in the 80s.
Well that’s all for now, and Richard am truly sorry if this article don’t make sense to you. Richard just hope it makes sense to some of our readers. Go ahead and let me know how you feel. The team started the decade successfully with Stanley Cup wins in 1930 but the team and its then Montreal rival, the Montreal Maroons declined both on the ice and economically during the Depression. Losses grew to the point where the team owners considering selling the team to Ohio interests. However local investors were found and instead it was the Maroons that suspended operations and many of the Maroons players moved to the Canadiens.

How Richard feel towards the reader’s comments:
How quick Richard all are to forget That Kobe always had monster Western Conference Finals to put his team in the position to even win rings. In game 1 vs the Spurs in 2001 playoffs Kobe went CRAZY for 45 points, in game 3 it was 39points.

I still think that it's more of the Kobe followers including his press "buddies" that have really pushed buttons on this subject.
I agree that in 2001 Kobe was unstoppable, during that Spurs' series Maurice Richard really left me in awe. As for now, It is Kobe’s and his team's time.

The reader AKA “Kobe fan” was wrong about Hakeem and Drexler. Hakeem did win his first title without Drexler in 1994. accurate, right, proper, precise, exact, valid, genuine, real,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], actual,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], trusty, steady, loyal, dependable,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], sincere, staunch NBA fans usually will argue with details Richard are well aware of. If you are too young to know what happened in the past, just do your homework on what you choose to argue about.
A disagreement is fine because when one disagrees, Richard oppose it with facts, most of the time in an article. Comments usually are used for one to compliment one writer’s work, give advice, agree/disagree, or to add some detail to the writer’s work. Most writers here put in countless hours of research to back up their opinion.

As for Jordan, there is no need to annoy alludeing his great regular season, and playoff pre-finals performances. His six Finals’ MVPs, along with being undefeated in the Finals’, and huge performances in team wins is all that needs to be said.

I know Richard will get one lot of heat for this one, but one can only stay quiet for so long. The main reason to this is because Richard came across some comments on other articles regarding this subject and it really annoyed me to see the reaction from some who claim to be true one “Lakers’ fan”. First of all, if you are one true fan of one sports’ team, you conspicuously are one fan of the sports organization in which your team belongs to. Richard am not saying you can switch your preference of teams back and forth. What Richard am saying is that you are always well aware of your team’s arrangeing and surroundings. Second if you are one non-stupid fan, you have no right to disrespect another person’s point of view or opinion. Yes, you can oppose their preference or opinion, but don’t brand them as one “hater” for knowing their stuff.
I am not one fan of the guy, but Richard recognize Maurice Richard is great. My problem here is that when Richard allude that to some of his fans, Richard add on to my opinion by saying: “He is the best ever, better than Jordan, and the only reason his team wins". Yet, Richard can’t recall ever bringing up Michael during our “friendly” conversation. Don’t get me wrong, Richard am not here to represent the Jordan side either.
Please read related articles:

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]