Turniej Pokemon
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Profil
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj
Forum Turniej Pokemon Strona Główna
->
Arena Trucizny
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
NIE
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Zarząd
----------------
Regulamin
Ogłoszenia
Trenerzy
----------------
Rio
Piter
Aja
Hao
Rużyk
Turniej
----------------
Zgłoszenia
Areny
----------------
Arena Wody
Arena Ziemii
Arena Powietrza
Arena Ognia
Arena Elektryczności
Arena Trucizny
Arena Rośliny
Arena Normal
Przegląd tematu
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="100%" class="forumline"> <tr> <th class="thCornerL" width="22%" height="26">Autor</th> <th class="thCornerR">Wiadomość</th> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>ghdhair100</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="http://picsrv.fora.pl/subBlack/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Wysłany: Wto 5:01, 15 Mar 2011<span class="gen"> </span> Temat postu: SENDIST or family court- who has final say-_1742</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">SENDIST or family court: who has final say? <br />A. this question was considered in the recent case of X County Council v DW, PW, and SW (2005)(2 FLR 508). A 10-year-old boy suffered from autistic spectrum disorder and associated behavioural difficulties of a kind that suggested he needed special educational provision.His parents disagreed, and thought him capable of coping with mainstream schooling. The family court made a care order in favour of the local authority, which was also the LEA and, as such, made a statement of special educational needs.Part 4 of the statement specified a special school maintained by the LEA. The care plan, which the judge approved, provided for the boy to be educated at that school. The local authority and the boy's guardian expressed concern at what would happen if the parents appealed to SENDIST, and SENDIST exercised its powers in such a way as to conflict with the care plan. (SENDIST is an independent tribunal to which parents can appeal against decisions made by LEAs about a child&rsquo;s education.)The LEA and guardian argued that there was a potential for conflict between the family court on the one hand, and SENDIST on the other.No compulsion on parentsAs the judge pointed out, there is no compulsion on parents to accept the special educational provision specified in the statement. They are free to make other 'suitable arrangements' for their child (s. 324 of the Education Act 1996). It is only if they do not that the LEA is under a duty to arrange the special educational provision. Parental responsibility prevailsDeciding where a child should go to school is an aspect of parental responsibility and, where the court has made a care order, parental responsibility is shared with the local authority.It is for the local authority and not for the parents to decide where a child in care should go to school. This does not, however,<a href="http://www.discountghdhair.net/ghd-blue-hair-straightener-p-182.html" target="_blank" class="postlink">GHD Blue Hair Straightener</a>, prevent the parents of a child in care from exercising their right of appeal to SENDIST. But the family court cannot dictate to SENDIST how it is to exercise its statutory jurisdiction in relation to a child who happens to be subject to a care order. Separate functionsThe functions of the family court and of SENDIST are separate and distinct. As far as the child's education is concerned, the ultimate questions for both the family court and SENDIST are very similar — but different tests apply to the decision-making process: SENDIST is regulated by the Education Act 1996 the family court has to apply the Children Act 1989 principle that the child's welfare is paramount However,<a href="http://www.australiaghdonline.com/" target="_blank" class="postlink">Ghd Straighteners Australia</a>, given that the ultimate questions for both the family court and SENDIST are so similar, there is no reason to suppose that they will arrive at different conclusions. The family court cannot dictate to SENDIST how it is to determine an appeal — but in practical terms SENDIST will have to take into account any order made, or views expressed, by the family court. Should SENDIST fail to take into account any relevant order or judgment of the family court, its decision may be reviewed by the High Court. What if court and tribunal disagree?There could, in theory, be an impasse: the family court taking one view as to where and how the child should be educated and SENDIST taking another. But such an impasse would be more theoretical than real because there is no compulsion on parents to accept the special educational provision specified in a statement of SEN even if it has been approved by SENDIST, provided they have made other 'suitable arrangements'. And the family court in this respect is in no worse position than a parent. If it can make other 'suitable arrangements' for the child's education, i.e. find some other suitable school that is willing to accept the child as a pupil,<a href="http://www.ghdaustraliastore.com/gold-ghd-iv-straightener-p-185.html" target="_blank" class="postlink">Gold GHD IV Styler</a>, then it is not obliged to agree that the child be sent to the school specified in the statement.Michael Segal is a district judge in the Family Division of the High CourtSend legal problems to The Editor, Education Law Update, 67-71 Goswell Road, London EC1V 7EP or email <a href="mailto:leila@optimuspub.co.uk">leila@optimuspub.co.uk</a>. We regret we can not enter into individual correspondence. While it is hoped the answers given here are helpful, they should not be relied on without seeking proper advice as to their application to your own circumstances. <br />The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination. <br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.mydfxx.com/home/space.php?uid=63159&do=blog&id=46903" target="_blank" class="postlink">肖传国获中美科技基金资助纪实_3600</a></span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="http://picsrv.fora.pl/subBlack/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> </table>
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Regulamin
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj